Contact Me By Email

Showing posts with label Internet Explorer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internet Explorer. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 09, 2011

Mozilla Releases Firefox 4.0 Release Candidate - PCWorld

Image representing Firefox as depicted in Crun...Image via CrunchBaseMozilla Releases Firefox 4.0 Release Candidate - PCWorld

The Mozilla Foundation has issued the first release candidate of Firefox version 4.0, finishing a grueling and ambitious beta development cycle for the browser.

This release candidate represents what the development team feels is a finished browser, said Johnathan Nightingale, director of Firefox development, in an interview.

The quality assurance team will still take feedback from users over the next few weeks, but if no major bugs are found, Mozilla expects to issue the full production release of the browser by the end of the month, he said.

If so, March will be a busy month for the ongoing browser wars. In addition to the pending final release of Firefox 4, Microsoft plans to launch version 9 of its Internet Explorer on March 14. And Google released version 10 of its Chrome browser on Monday.

Version 4 of Firefox is a major upgrade for the open-source browser, and includes a wealth of new features and enhancements.

The user interface has been completely revamped and streamlined, with the menu bar condensed under a single button. The JavaScript Engine has been overhauled for speedier performance. The Add-ons Manager has been upgraded to a full-page interface.

Tab management has also taken a great leap forward. Users can bundle sets of tabs into different groups, under a feature called Panorama. They can add small permanent tabs to the top of the browser, for those pages and applications they continually keep open.

For the first time, Firefox will allow users to synchronize their bookmarks across different computers and even with Android-based mobile phones. This is also the first version of the browser to include the Do Not Track feature, which can alert website owners if the user wishes to opt out of third-party Web tracking.

The release candidate is available for the Windows, Mac and Linux platforms, and supports more than 70 languages. Current users of the beta version will have their browsers automatically updated.

Google Chrome 10's New Settings Menu



The best browser in the world has gotten even better. It is sven much faster than version 9. Google Chrome has been updated 6 times since May of 2010. Those folks who still naively use Internet Explorer have not sen an update of that terrible browser in over three years. If you still use Internet Explorer download Chrome and you will be shocked by what you have been missing.

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Bulk of browsers found to be at risk of attack | Browsers & Add-Ons | Macworld

Bulk of browsers found to be at risk of attack | Browsers & Add-Ons | Macworld

About eight out of every 10 Web browsers run by consumers are vulnerable to attack by exploits
of already-patched bugs, a security expert said today.

The poor state of browser patching stunned Wolfgang Kandek, CTO of security risk and compliance management provider Qualys, which presented data from the companyʼs free BrowserCheck service Wednesday at the RSA Conference in San Francisco
.
“I really thought it would be lower,” said Kandek of the nearly 80 percent of browsers that lacked one or more patches.

BrowserCheck scans Windows, Mac and Linux machines for vulnerable browsers, as well as up
to 18 browser plug-ins, including Adobeʼs Flash and Reader, Oracleʼs Java and Microsoftʼs Silverlight and Windows Media Player.

When browsers and their plug-ins are tabulated together, between 90 percent and 65 percent of all consumer systems scanned with BrowserCheck since June 2010 reported at least one out-of- date component, depending on the month. In January 2011, about 80 percent of the machines were vulnerable.

Even worse, about 30 percent of browser plug-ins are perpetually unpatched, a rate triple that of Windows, where Qualysʼ data has shown that, on average, about 10 percent of all PCs never receive Microsoftʼs patches.

When plug-ins were excluded, browsers fared better: Only about 25 percent of the scanned machines had an unpatched browser on board last month.
Kandek read those results as proof that browser updates were applied more regularly by users. “The lower percentage shows that updating works pretty well for [browsers],” he said.

Unlike most plug-ins, browsers either silently self update — as does Googleʼs Chrome—or automatically check for new patches, a practice of Microsoftʼs Internet Explorer (IE) and Mozillaʼs Firefox.

The most likely plug-in to require a patch is Oracleʼs Java, which was outdated on more than 40 percent of the scanned systems. Adobeʼs Reader was second, with about 32 percent of the computers reporting a vulnerable version. Appleʼs QuickTime took third, with less than 25%.
Java was also in the top spotlast year when Qualys unveiled statistics from BrowserCheckʼs first three months of operation.
“I bet that most people donʼt even know that they have Java, or how it installs,” said Kandek. “Exploit writers have recognized that, and have been adding Java exploits in their toolkits.”

Although Oracle usually releases Java updates quarterly, last week it rushed out an emergency patch to quash a critical bug.
Kandek said he sees two solutions.
“A single updater would be the right thing [to have],” he said, referring to calls heʼs made before that Microsoft take on the responsibility for patching important third-party plug-ins.

“All the different patching mechanisms are confusing, a bit of this and some of that,” Kandek
added, arguing that that was one reason why so many plug-ins go unpatched.

A second answer may come with the newest round of browsers—such as Firefox 4, IE9 and Chrome—that support HTML5, the Web standard that can handle the audio and video processing now done by many of the most popular plug-ins, including Flash, QuickTime and Windows Media Player.
“Moving more functionality into the bowsers with HTML5 would help, because then you donʼt need those plug-ins,” Kandek said.

He also applauded Google for updating Flash alongside Chrome, and for integrating a bare- bones HTML-based PDF viewer into its browser, moves rivals have not mimicked.

Friday, February 11, 2011

Browser Feature War: IE9 RC1 vs. Firefox 4 vs. Chrome 9 - PCWorld

Browser Feature War: IE9 RC1 vs. Firefox 4 vs. Chrome 9 - PCWorld



The browser wars are back with a vengeance.

Microsoft recently launched its first release candidate for Internet Explorer 9 (IE9 RC1), which features hardware acceleration, a simplified interface, Windows 7 jump lists, and a new "do not track" feature.

Not to be outdone, Google Chrome 9, which launched earlier this month, is sporting 3D hardware acceleration, Google Instant Search, and the Chrome Web Store. Meanwhile, Firefox 4 is in on its one-millionth beta (just kidding, it's on beta 11), rocking its own online tracking opt-out mechanism, an updated interface, and WebGL hardware acceleration.

It's a browser battle for the ages. But watch out Chrome and Firefox, the Borg (that was Microsoft's pet name in the 90's, kids) are back and this time resistance really is futile. Let's take a look.

Don't Follow Me

The Federal Trade Commission has been clamoring for Web browsers to institute do not track features that tell online advertisers you don't want them to follow you around while you browse the Web. Internet Explorer 9 has answered that call with a new feature called Tracking Protection. IE9's do not track feature allows you to create lists of sites that you want to block from tracking you. You can created your own list or find some pre-defined lists here on Microsoft's IE9 Website. To enable Tracking Protection in IE9, click on the settings cog in the upper right corner of IE9 RC1 then select Safety>Tracking Protection.

Firefox's answer to tracking is much simpler. The browser has simply instituted a system that puts a message in your browser's metadata that tells Websites you visit that you don't want to be tracked. Of course, it's any body's guess if the sites you visit will honor your request, but it's still a simple and elegant approach. To turn on Firefox 4's do not track feature in Windows 7 go to the Firefox tab in the upper left corner then click Options>Options>Advanced. Then under "Browsing" select "Tell web sites I do not want to be tracked." ??Chrome also has a do not track feature that you can activate by downloading an add-on called "Keep My Opt-outs."

Click to ZoomSimplified Interface

Firefox 4's new look is pretty much the same as it has been since Firefox 4's first beta came out in the middle of last year. Windows Vista and 7 users will see a new orange button in the upper left corner of the browser that houses most of Firefox's menu items. The home button and favorites can be found on the far right side of the browser window. Firefox also has tabs on top similar to Chrome's approach. This means you have less browser to deal with and more room to view the actual Web page.

Click to ZoomInternet Explorer also joined the Chrome-style revolution with IE9 RC1. The toolbar has been shaved down and the tabs have been put on the same line as the URL address bar to maximize the space for Web page views. The downside is that multiple tabs quickly go off the screen in IE9. You can change this by right-clicking any tab and selecting "Show tabs on a separate row." This will move your tabs to a separate row from the URL address bar, but it will cost you a tiny fraction of Web page viewing space.

In my advanced tests (by putting my finger on the screen), I determined that all three browsers now have pretty much the same screen space for viewing Web pages when you run them without toolbars.

Hardware Acceleration

All three browsers are focused on improving browser speeds. Internet Explorer 9 RC1 uses its own brand of hardware acceleration designed to take advantage of multiple processor cores as well as optimizing the power of your machine's graphics processing unit (GPU). IE9 RC1 also uses special Windows APIs to improve performance for 3D graphics, and has an improved JavaScript engine.

Both Chrome and Firefox use a Web standard called WebGL that speeds up the performance of online 3D graphics without the use of plug-ins. Firefox 4 also has a new JavaScript engine called JägerMonkey to improve speed performance. The latest Firefox beta build also uses hardware acceleration to improve speeds.

During my browsing session with each browser, IE9 appeared to react a little faster than both Firefox and Chrome by about two seconds. But we'll have to wait for PC World's official tests to get a better idea of which browser is actually faster.

Chrome Web Store and Instant

Google Chrome users in the United States now have access to the Chrome Web Store in Chrome 9. Just click on "Chrome Web Store" when you open a new tab to check out all the Web-based apps you can subscribe to or try out for free. You can check out this run down of 10 cool Web apps to get started.

Click to ZoomYou can also use Google Chrome 9's new search feature, Instant, that shows you web pages as you type and tries to predict just what you're looking for. To turn on instant in Chrome go to click on the wrench icon in the upper right corner and select "Options." Then select the check box that says "Enable Instant for faster searching and browsing."

Jump Lists

For Windows 7 users IE9's pinned Websites can be very handy. If you want to have easy access to sites you visit on a regular basis just drag the site's tab from IE9 into your Windows taskbar to pin it there. This will allow you to open the site in its own browser window with just one click. Some sites are also taking advantage of IE9's jump list feature that give you quick access to specific parts of the site. PC World's IE9 jump lists give you quick access to News, Reviews, Business Center, App Guide and How To sections. You can find out if a site has jump lists by right-clicking the pinned site's icon in your taskbar.

So which browser is best? Well, choosing a browser is more about your own personal taste than anything else. Internet Explorer may not be the dominant browsing force it once was, but with improved performance and a few handy features, it is well worth a look. Can it regain its once dominant position in the browser market with plus 90 percent share? It certainly has a long way to go from its current position of about 56 percent share, according to recent numbers from Net Applications. But IE9 RC1 is an impressive browser and just might let Microsoft dominate the Web browsing market once more. Like I said, the Borg are back baby, and this time you will be assimilated.

Connect with Ian Paul (@ianpaul) and Today@PCWorld on Twitter for the latest tech news and analysis.

Saturday, February 05, 2011

Google calls Microsoft a copycat (week in review) | Business Tech - CNET News

Image representing Google as depicted in Crunc...Image via CrunchBaseGoogle calls Microsoft a copycat (week in review) | Business Tech - CNET News

Google has a harsh word to describe Microsoft: plagiarist.
After noticing curious search results at Bing, then running a sting operation to investigate further, Google has concluded that Microsoft was copying Google search results into its own search engine. The story began with Google's team for correcting typographical errors in search terms, which monitors its own and rivals' performance closely.
Next came the sting, which featured a one-time code that manually ranked a page for a specific term. Google then had employees type in those terms from home using Internet Explorer with both Suggested Sites and the Bing Toolbar enabled, clicking the top results as they went. Two weeks later, Bing showed the Google results that had been hand-coded.

A Bing executive acknowledged monitoring what links users clicked but essentially described it as letting humans help gather data through crowdsourcing.
However, another executive was adamant that Microsoft was not using Google's search results.
"We do not copy results from any of our competitors. Period. Full stop," Yusuf Mehdi, Microsoft's senior VP of its Online Services Division, wrote in a post on Bing's community blog. "We have some of the best minds in the world at work on search quality and relevance, and for a competitor to accuse any one of these people of such activity is just insulting."



Wednesday, January 05, 2011

Internet Explorer falls behind Firefox in Europe for first time, says StatCounter | Technology | guardian.co.uk

Image representing Firefox as depicted in Crun...Image via CrunchBaseInternet Explorer falls behind Firefox in Europe for first time, says StatCounter | Technology | guardian.co.uk

Microsoft's browser - all versions - now trumped by open source product, with the losses apparently due to rise in use of Google Chrome. But is that because of the 'browser ballot' in Windows?
Firefox has narrowly overtaken Internet Explorer in Europe, according to StatCounter
Statcounter, a web statistics company, says that Firefox has now passed Internet Explorer, for the first time ever, to become the most-used browser in Europe.

The screengrab above (or see it on their web page) shows what happened, with Firefox trundling along at 38% or so, and Internet Explorer falling to about 37.5%.

On which the company remarked, "This is the first time that IE has been dethroned from the number one spot in a major territory," commented Aodhan Cullen, CEO, StatCounter. "This appears to be happening because Google's Chrome is stealing share from Internet Explorer while Firefox is mainly maintaining its existing share."

Indeed, that's what the figures seem to show. Comparing the North American market (see pic) shows a broadly similar trend, but Internet Explorer is miles ahead there.

Internet Explorer share is holding up in North America, StatCounter says
Arguably, one reason why Firefox is so prevalent in Europe might be Germany, where it is streets ahead of anything in market share terms - at least according to StatCounter's numbers.

But another theory I've heard put forward is that IE's decline is due to the browser ballot, launched in March, in which the 200m or so Windows users in Europe were offered a sort of roulette where they could choose to install a different default browser from a randomly shuffled group of 12, with the top 5 (IE, Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Opera) presented first in what turned out to be only a quasi-random order that slightly favoured Chrome, until it was fixed.

So was it the ballot wot won it? Looking at the graphs, it's hard to say that there's any evidence of a sudden upward lurch in Chrome's share, nor a sudden downward one for IE. Nor does Firefox show any dramatic difference, which you might expect if the ballot had really influenced people. True, StatCounter was reported as claiming late in March that the ballot was "already having an effect" (though there's no actual link to that study on its site). But looking at the numbers, it's not so evident; all that seems to be happening is a long-term trend as more and more individuals - and particularly businesses - adopt other browsers.

Even so, the advent of more competition in the browser market does have one good side effect: it increases the pressure for standards, and especially compliance (by browser writers) to standards like CSS2 and CSS3, and to emerging standards such as HTML5. Microsoft hasn't given up there - it's working on IE9 as you read this. But it's quite possible that the days when Internet Explorer was the only browser to code for are gone forever. In the future, the W3C's HTML standard might be what coders develop against.

Monday, January 03, 2011

Chrome finishes 2010 with 10 percent share | Deep Tech - CNET News

Google Chrome IconImage via WikipediaChrome finishes 2010 with 10 percent share | Deep Tech - CNET News


With the steady rise in Chrome, 1 out of every 10 people surfing the Web in December used Google's browser.
Chrome's gains have come largely at the expense of Microsoft's Internet Explorer, whose usage share has been dropping for years, but there's also a ray of hope for Redmond. IE9, which embodies Microsoft's ambition to build a cutting-edge browser once again, is showing signs of real adoption with usage that grew from 0.4 percent in November to 0.5 percent in December, according to new statistics from Net Applications.

Fractions of a percent may sound insignificant, but with hundreds of millions of people using the Web, they actually represent a large number of real users. And in the current competitive market, browser makers are attuned to where the growth is occurring.

For months now, Chrome has risen. Most recently, it rose from 9.3 percent in November statistics to 10 percent in December, according to Net Applications. That's helpful for Google's ambition to speed up the Web overall; Chrome is a vehicle by which the company can explore, develop, and promote new features, such as Native Client, SPDY, WebP, andFalse Start, that Google hopes will speed the Web and make it a more powerful foundation for applications.

Mozilla's Firefox, the second-place browser, stayed flat at about 22.8 percent, Apple's Safari rose from 5.6 percent to 5.9 percent, and Opera was flat at about 2.2 percent. Chrome and Safari grew at the expense of IE, which dropped from 58.4 percent to 57.1 percent.

Note that because browser usage overall is increasing, even percentages that remain flat from month to month still mean a growing user base.

Microsoft can take consolation that its share losses have come from older versions of its browser. IE6, an advanced browser when released nearly a decade ago but now despised among Web developers for retarding progress on the Web, dropped from 13.7 percent in November to 13.1 percent in December. IE7 dropped from 9.5 percent to 8.8 percent.
More...

Sunday, December 26, 2010

Google Turns Borg: Time to Rein in the Search Giant - PCWorld

Google Turns Borg: Time to Rein in the Search Giant - PCWorld

By Bill Snyder
Dec 26, 2010 10:23 AM
Remember when Microsoft was the company feared for trying to dominate the computing world? That risk has passed, but a new one -- with Google in the role of the bad Borg -- is taking its place.

Microsoft's "ownership" of the desktop operating system and its attempt to own the Internet via Internet Explorer was a terrible detriment to innovation and competition in the tech marketplace -- so it was struck down, first by the U.S. Justice Department's antitrust actions and more recently by users as they adopt alternative technologies in the cloud and in mobile devices. It's hard to argue that an unfettered Microsoft, free to strangle the Internet in its cradle by jamming Internet Explorer down everyone's throat, would have been a good thing.

Today, the desktop operating system as we knew it is no longer the centerpiece of computing. That's not to say it isn't important, but technology has moved on. At the moment, nothing has really taken its place; the tech world is multipolar, with products from Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, and -- perhaps most important -- Google determining how billions of people related to the digital world.

If anything sets the tone for both desktop and mobile computing today, it's search, and there of course is where Google has no real rival. (Sorry Bing, you've yet to move to the major leagues.) The combination of search and advertising is the Windows of today. Search dominates our experience of the Web, while advertising dominates the business model of the Web. That's not a new thought, of course, but Google's planned foray into the online travel business, not a sector I'd normally care about, brings new concerns about the search giant's effect on competition to the fore. Coincidentally, the E.U. shares that concern and is already investigating.

In July, Google reached an agreement to buy ITA Software, a maker of air-travel information applications, but the $700 million deal is awaiting U.S. federal regulatory approval. The acquisition was the subject of a rather critical editorial in the New York Times, a piece that provoked conversation around the Web, some of it pretty interesting.

Greg Sterling over at Search Engine Land critiqued the Times for not just coming out and saying what he thinks the paper really means: block the deal. So I'll say it: Block the deal, and take a hard look at Google's effect on competition.

When Microsoft ruled the earth

In case you weren't around in the 1980s, let me remind you of how Microsoft used to act.

Every now and then, Bill Gates would look around and notice a technology, generally one owned by a small company, and decide it should be part of DOS -- and later, Windows. Microsoft would then add a feature like disk compression or file management to the operating system and give it away. That spelled the end of lots of small competitors and a certain amount of innovation.

Gates later realized that the Internet was the next big thing, so Microsoft bundled Internet Explorer with Windows. That, of course, is what prompted the Department of Justice to sue the company and eventually force it to unbundle IE. It's worth remembering that Microsoft swore up and down that pulling IE from Windows wasn't possible without wrecking the OS. Monopolists always come up with self-serving rationales to convince the world that what they're up to is the way things have to be. Usually they'll tell you that their domination of the marketplace is good for everyone.

Google should be stopped before it gets too strong

Just as Microsoft's power wasn't good for us, neither is Google's growing stature, and Google would do just fine if it were reined in. Indeed, a bit more focus might be helpful. Witness the Nexus One fiasco. Google had no clue how to operate in the mobile market, and it flat out embarrassed itself, probably wasting a good deal of money and time with a poorly thought-out initiative. The Nexus One was hardly an isolated incident. Google TV and Google Wave are similar fiascos by a company trying to do everything but not very well. In fact, the company tripped all over itself for much of 2010.

We're lucky that Google has been so inept, as that has kept it from dominating even more businesses -- so far. At some point, Google could succeed in its new endeavors. Allowing Google to play Microsoft and gradually dominate an expanding ring of related businesses would be bad for Internet users everywhere.

Like it or not, advertising is the lifeblood of the Web. If Google owns ITA, whose software is used by many large travel sites, I'd expect search rankings for competitors such as Kayak and Orbitz to suffer. That means less consumer choice in the short run and the greater loss of innovation due to the much higher bar it would set for any new company to enter the market.

As the Times pointed out, look at what happened to MapQuest when Google entered that business: It tanked, in part because Google started putting its own maps on top in response to queries about locations.

The same logic applies to other markets, including those we may care about more than online travel. Wireless location services, when teamed with search and advertising, are opening the door to innovative new business models. If Google makes another more successful run at the wireless market, what happens to competition in that arena?

Google, like Microsoft before it, needs to be reined in. It will still be a great company, and it will be free to innovate and beat the heck out of its competition -- but that beating will take place on the proverbial level playing field.

This is my last post of the year. Thanks to all of you for reading and taking the trouble to set me straight with your comments and emails when I needed it. See you in 2011. Happy New Year!

I welcome your comments, tips, and suggestions. Post them here so that all our readers can share them, or reach me at bill.snyder@sbcglobal.net. Follow me on Twitter at BSnyderSF.

This article, "It's time to rein in Google -- before it assimilates all Web business," was originally published by InfoWorld.com. Read more of Bill Snyder's Tech's Bottom Line blog and follow the latest technology business developments at InfoWorld.com.

Saturday, December 11, 2010

Microsoft Readies Record Patch Tuesday - PCWorld

The current logo of Microsoft Windows, the com...Image via WikipediaMicrosoft Readies Record Patch Tuesday - PCWorld

Microsoft says it will deliver a record 17 security updates next week to patch 40 vulnerabilities in Windows, Internet Explorer (IE), Office, SharePoint and Exchange.

Among the 40 patches will be two that address a pair of bugs that hackers have already exploited.
"I really was not expecting 17," said Andrew Storms, director of security operations at nCircle Security. "I expected 10 at the most."
The 17 updates -- Microsoft calls them "bulletins" -- are a record, beating the count from October 2010 by one. The bulletins that will ship next Tuesday will include 40 patches, Microsoft said, nine fewer than the record set last October, but six more than the next-largest months of October 2009 and June and August of this year.
The total bulletin count for the year -- 106 -- was also a record, as was the number of vulnerabilities patched in those updates: 266.
Microsoft defended the blistering bug patching pace of 2010.
"This is partly due to vulnerability reports in Microsoft products increasing slightly ... [and to the fact that] Microsoft supports products for up to ten years," said Mike Reavey, the director of the Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC), in a post to the team's blog today. "Older products meeting newer attack methods, coupled with overall growth in the vulnerability marketplace, result in more vulnerability reports."
But it was December's big number that caught Storms' eye.
"The sheer number is quite surprising for December," said Storms. In the past three years, Microsoft has issued no more than nine updates in December, he said. "And while Microsoft doesn't necessarily take its cues from the rest of the world, the fact is many organizations won't patch a lot of these until after the first of the year," Storms continued.

Not only will enterprise IT staffs be short-handed this month -- what with holidays and vacation time -- but they will be unlikely to risk problems that could crop up in patching during such an important time of the year for their business.
"In this case, there might be less risk involved by doing nothing," said Storms. "That's especially true of companies, like those in the financial sector, that have locked down their networks since early November."
Many firms forbid patching the last two months of the year to insure that their hardware continues to operate, said Storms.
Two of the 17 updates were tagged with Microsoft's "critical" label, the highest threat ranking in its four-step scoring system. Another 14 were marked "important," the second-highest rating, while the remaining update was labeled "moderate."
Ten of the updates could be exploited by attackers to remotely inject malicious code into vulnerable PCs, Microsoft said in its usual bare-bones advance notification . Microsoft often labels remote code executable bugs -- the most dangerous -- as important when the vulnerable components are not switched on by default or when other mitigating factors, such as defensive measures like ASLR and DEP, may protect some users.
Among the fixes slated for next week will be one that addresses an already-disclosed vulnerability in all supported versions of IE, said Reavey.
In early November, Microsoft disclosed the zero-day IE bug and confirmed that attacks were already circulating . It was unable to craft and test a patch in time to make it into that month's security update, which appeared six days later.

Next week's IE update is one of the two marked critical, and will affect all versions of the browser with the possible exception of IE9, which is still in preview mode.
Microsoft also intends to patch the last of four Windows vulnerabilities that were used by the notorious Stuxnet worm to infiltrate industrial control systems, said Reavey. As far as Microsoft knows, the bug, which lets attackers elevate access privileges on a compromised PC, has not been exploited by malware other than Stuxnet.
Exploit code for that vulnerability, however, has been available on the Internet for several weeks.
Of the 17 updates, 13 will affect one or more versions of Windows, two will patch Office and Microsoft Works on Windows, and one each will address bugs in the Exchange and SharePoint server software.

Storms was concerned about the Exchange update.
"Anytime it has to do with e-mail, it's concerning," he said, adding that because the server must face the outside world, there may be easily-exploited attack vectors. "SharePoint, on the other hand, is usually very well protected inside the network," he said.
Also of interest, Storms said, was what Microsoft today identified only as "Bulletin 2," an update that affects all versions of Windows, but was tagged as critical for newer editions, including Windows Vista, Windows 7 and Server 2008. The same bulletin was marked as important for the older Windows XP and Server 2003 operating systems.
The Microsoft patch burden this month will be especially tough for administrators to deal with, because of other events, notably the WikiLeaks release of confidential U.S. diplomatic messages, and the resulting retaliatory distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks against firms like Amazon, MasterCard and PayPal.
"It is enough that IT administrators are addressing the current DDoS service attacks surrounding WikiLeaks where anyone could very quickly become a target, but now organizations also have to address this disruptive Patch Tuesday from Microsoft with 17 bulletins," said Paul Henry, a security analyst at Lumension, in an e-mail Thursday.
"There's more than enough to handle at the moment without this Patch Tuesday," added Storms. "There's the ongoing WikiLeaks attacks and then there are always zero-days released around Christmas."

Storms was confident that Microsoft would include workarounds for the most egregious of next week's bugs that will help organizations and users protect themselves if they were unable to apply the security updates.
"That's something that Microsoft is actually been very good at lately," said Storms. "I expect that they'll deliver a decent set of mitigations."
Microsoft will release the 17 updates at approximately 1 p.m. ET on Dec. 14.
__________________________________
There is an easy solution. Buy a Mac.

John H. Armwood

Saturday, December 04, 2010

Google Chrome 8 Review & Rating | PCMag.com

Google Chrome IconImage via WikipediaGoogle Chrome 8 Review & Rating | PCMag.com

With Chrome, Google single-handedly set off a revolution in the Web surfing software on several fronts: Its blazingly fast JavaScript performance kicked competitors like Firefox (Free, 4.5 stars), Internet Explorer (Free, 4 stars), Safari (Free, 4 stars), and Opera into a speed race. It also started the trend of minimizing the application's window to let the Web page shine unimpeded. The current release takes this to the extreme, with but a single menu button. It's also the most frequently updated browser, now at version 8 after a little over 2 years of existence.

Most releases have brought new major features, such as bookmark syncing, a bookmark manager, and extensions capability, though others have just added speed, stability, and new standard support. This latest release brings with it a built-in PDF reader, along with some bug and security fixes. The fine design, compatibility, and especially the speed have impressed the Web community enough to make Chrome the fastest growing browser in terms of market share, with the ten percent mark nearing. Let's take a look at what makes this browser so special.

Swift Setup
Even the setup process shows Chrome's commitment to speed: Just click the Install button on the Chrome Web page, and you'll have the new browser up and running in less than a minute, with no wizard to go through and no system restart. The browser's now available for Mac OS X and Linux, as well as Windows. In each platform the browser's up and running before you realize it, and it updates itself automatically in the background.

View SlideshowSee all (12) slides
More
Built-in Flash and PDF Support
Chrome is the only browser to come with Adobe Flash built in, rather than requiring a separate (and annoying) installation. And not having to perform the frequent required updates of the Flash plugin separately is another boon--it updates automatically with the browser.

Chrome boasts a PDF reader as well, so you don't have to worry about installing any Adobe plugins for viewing specialized web content. When you load a PDF, an intuitive toolbar shows when your mouse cursor is in the southeast vicinity of the browser window. From this, you can have the document fill the width of the window, show a full page, or zoom in and out. By default, you can select text for cutting and pasting, but I couldn't copy and paste images. You can print the PDF as you would any Web page.

Interface
Minimalism has been a hallmark of Chrome since its first beta release. Tabs are above everything, and the only row below them holds the combined search/address bar, or "Omnibar." Optionally you can display bookmark links in a row below this. And the control buttons on the top-right of the browser have been reduced window to the absolute minimum—just one. Google has removed the Page icon and placed some of its functions under the Wrench choice. Some Page options have been combined into buttons on one line in the new menu, such as Cut, Copy, and Paste. I like what Google's done with the Zoom choice on the menu, adding plus and minus buttons that save you from having to fly out another submenu.

Tabtastic
Chrome also still sports excellent tab implementation. Tabs are prominent at the top of the browser window, and you can drag them out to the desktop to create independent windows (and drag them back in later) or split them side by side à la Windows 7 Aero Snap.

Google has put considerable thought into its browser's new tab page, which shows thumbnails of your most-visited pages. I like that you can move the large thumbnails around and pin them in place, or remove those you don't want. You also now have a choice of list or thumbnail view, and you can display only recently closed tabs, only most visited pages, or neither.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Google: Chrome will be 60 times faster | Browsers - InfoWorld

Image representing Google Chrome as depicted i...Image via CrunchBaseGoogle: Chrome will be 60 times faster | Browsers - InfoWorld
No, that's not a typo in the headline: In a post at the Chromium blog, software engineers James Robinson and Gregg Tavares say that early versions of Chrome 7 are boasting speeds 60 times faster than Chrome 6. The key, they say, is hardware acceleration -- the same technology that's giving Microsoft's Internet Explorer 9 beta such a boost.
The new feature, say Robinson and Tavares, "picks the best graphics API to use on each OS that Chromium supports: Windows XP/Vista/7, Mac OS and Linux."

Monday, August 16, 2010

At 15, Microsoft's Internet Explorer at a crossroads | Beyond Binary - CNET News

Internet Explorer Mobile LogoImage via WikipediaAt 15, Microsoft's Internet Explorer at a crossroads | Beyond Binary - CNET News
by Ina Fried
Thanks to corporate use and ties to Windows, Internet Explorer has remained dominant in the browser space ever since it won the first browser wars with Netscape a decade ago.
However, by allowing the browser to stagnate after the release of Windows XP in 2001, Microsoft created an opening that paved the way for the rise of Firefox and, more recently, Google's Chrome.
As a result Internet Explorer celebrates its 15th birthday Monday as market leader and like an upstart trying to compete against powerful rivals.
Arguably, the browser has never been more important--or competitive. As of July, Microsoft had just over 60 percent of the market, gaining share for two months in a row after years of ceding ground to Firefox and Chrome. Firefox, meanwhile, held about 23 percent, Chrome about 7 percent, and Apple's Safari roughly 5 percent, according to Net Applications.

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

The Best Web Browser: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer, Opera, or Safari? - PCWorld

Image representing Google Chrome as depicted i...Image via CrunchBase
The Best Web Browser: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer, Opera, or Safari? - PCWorld

Not too long ago the job of a Web browser was simple: Get the text from the Internet and pour it into the window. If a tag like comes along, change the font. Now the challenges are greater because the browser is becoming the home for almost everything we do. Do you have documents to edit? There's a website for that. Did you miss a television show? There's a website for that. Do you want to announce your engagement? There's a website for that too. The Web browser handles all of that and more.

Choosing a best browser is an impossible job. On one hand, the programs are as close to commodities as there are in the computer industry. The core standards are pretty solid and the job of rendering the document is well understood. Most differences can be smoothed over when the Web designers use cross-platform libraries like jQuery. Many websites look the same in all of the major browsers, a testament to the hard work of the developers and their desire to get their information out to the largest audience.
_______________________________
For me and many others the answer is Google's Chrome 5. Nothing else come close. The worst is easily Internet Explorer. The current versions of Safari and Firefox are good but Chrome 5 is simply better. It is very fast, stable and flexible.

John H. Armwood

Monday, August 02, 2010

Browser Wars Enter a New Round - PCWorld

Browser Wars Enter a New Round - PCWorld

Apple released version 5.0.1 of its Safari browser last week. It fixes one major security vulnerability. More pleasantly, it turns on support for extensions, which Apple is now collecting in its new Extensions Gallery. The quantity of available add-ins is skimpy compared to Chrome or (especially) Firefox, but there's already some good stuff -- I like Gmail Counter, which adds a button indicating how many e-mails have arrived since you last checked your inbox, along with a banner that rotates through recent subject lines. And Safari extensions have the most seamless installation process I've seen to date -- one click, and you're good to go.

Until now, when folks have asked me how the major browsers stack up, I've mostly praised Safari but noted that the lack of extensions made for a less customizable working environment. Now it's got ‘em. One more reason to consider using Safari, one less major distinguishing characteristic for the competition.

Which got me to thinking: It's been a long time since the race for best browser was this close. Safari, Firefox, Chrome, and Opera are all really good -- and they're growing more and more similar. (Internet Explorer still lags behind, although everything we know so far about IE9 is promising.) The overarching goals are mostly industry-wide ones, such as more minimalist interfaces, zippier performance, cutting-edge HTML5 support, and slicker frameworks for extensions and other customizations.

An embarrassment of excellent browsers to choose from is great news, of course. But on some weird level, it leaves me blasé about the whole topic. A few years ago, I was practically going door-to-door urging strangers to use Firefox. Today, I'm more likely to explain that most of the major browsers are roughly comparable. And I can't always remember which browser I'm using at the moment. (At the moment, I have Safari, Chrome, and Firefox open -- I'm writing this post in Firefox, but I had to check.)

We seem to be in a period of equilibrium, but I don't think it'll last forever. At some point, interfaces will get as sleek as they're going to get, it'll be hard to eke any more speed out of JavaScript engines, and HTML5 will be everywhere. Browser developers will need to latch onto fresh ideas -- and when they do, their products might once again feel more distinctive than they do at the moment.

Okay, I'm not claiming that there's nothing unique in current browsers. A few examples of fresh ideas currently on display: Safari's easy-reading mode, Firefox's "Tab Candy," Opera's Turbo browsing, and all the social features in my favorite underdog browser, Flock. I'd love to see more stuff like this, and I'm keeping my fingers crossed that we're headed for a new era of browser inventiveness rather than an age of stasis...
___________________________________
As far as I am concerned the choice is clear. Chrome 5 is the browser of choice on any platform. I regularly use it on my Mac and on my wife's P.C. I uninstalled FireFox after using Chrome 5, when it was released for Mac. It is so much faster than FireFox and more flexible than Safari 5. On a PC it is much faster than FireFox and Internet Explorer is not even in the running. It is slow, there are no extensions and it is buggy. Safari 5 now supports some of the Asian sites that you used to need Internet Explorer to use. Enterprise I.T. departments need to get off their rusty dusty and switch to chrome 5.

John H. Armwood