Contact Me By Email

Friday, May 27, 2011

Senator blocks controversial copyright bill | Web | Macworld

Senator blocks controversial copyright bill | Web | Macworld

by Grant Gross, IDG News Service May 27, 2011 12:30 pm A U.S. senator has blocked a controversial bill that would enlist ISPs, search engines and other
businesses in blocking access to alleged websites infringing copyright.
Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, has blocked the Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act, or PROTECT IP Act, from coming to the Senate floor for a vote.

On Thursday, just two weeks after the bill was introduced, the Senate Judiciary Committee unanimously voted to move the PROTECT IP Act to the Senate floor. Under Senate rules, a single senator can place a hold on a bill, although the block can be overridden by a 60-vote majority.
The PROTECT IP Act would allow the U.S. Department of Justice to seek court orders requiring search engines and ISPs to stop sending traffic to Websites accused of infringing copyright. The bill would also allow copyright holders to seek court orders requiring payment processors and online ad networks to stop doing business with allegedly infringing websites.

The legislation would attack free speech online and hurt e-commerce, Wyden said.
“I understand and agree with the goal of the legislation, to protect intellectual property and combat commerce in counterfeit goods, but I am not willing to muzzle speech and stifle innovation and economic growth to achieve this objective,” he said in a statement. “At the expense of legitimate commerce, [the billʼs] prescription takes an overreaching approach to policing the Internet when a more balanced and targeted approach would be more effective. The collateral damage of this approach is speech, innovation and the very integrity of the Internet.”

Wyden called the Internet the “shipping lane” of the 21st century. “It is increasingly in Americaʼs economic interest to ensure that the Internet is a viable means for American innovation, commerce, and the advancement of our ideals that empower people all around the world,” he said. “By ceding control of the Internet to corporations through a private right of action, and to government agencies that do not sufficiently understand and value the Internet, [the bill] represents a threat to our economic future and to our international objectives.”

Critics of the bill have said it would lead to hundreds of court cases brought by copyright owners against online businesses. The legislation would lead to a blacklist of Internet sites and compromise the Internetʼs Domain Name System, critics have said.

But backers of the bill have said new methods are needed to combat copyright infringement by foreign Websites. The bill would target the worst foreign Websites trafficking in digital piracy and counterfeit goods and would dry up their business by focusing on user traffic, advertising and payments, proponents said.
Copyright infringement and the sale of counterfeit goods can cost American businesses billions of dollars, and result in hundreds of thousands of lost jobs,” Senator Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat and lead sponsor of the bill, said Thursday.

U.S. law enforcement agencies are limited in their ability to combat infringing Websites operated overseas, Leahy added in a statement. “American consumers are too often deceived into thinking the products they are purchasing at these Websites are legitimate because they are easily accessed through their homeʼs Internet service provider, found through well known search engines, and are complete with corporate advertising, credit card acceptance, and advertising links that make them appear legitimate,” he said.

Wyden blocked a similar bill, the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act, or COICA, after the Senate Judiciary Committee passed it in late 2010. COICA would have expanded federal agenciesʼ power to seize the domain names of allegedly infringing Websites.

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Introducing Music Beta by Google

Microsoft to Acquire Skype - WSJ.com

Microsoft to Acquire Skype - WSJ.com


By ANUPREETA DAS And NICK WINGFIELD
Microsoft Corp. agreed Tuesday to buy Internet phone company Skype Technologies SA for $8.5 billion in cash—the most aggressive move yet by Microsoft to play in the increasingly converged worlds of communication, information and entertainment.
Skype will become a new business division within Microsoft, and Skype Chief Executive Tony Bates will assume the title of president of the Microsoft Skype Division, reporting directly to Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer.
The deal allows Microsoft to integrate Skype's free and low-cost Internet-based video and telephony services into everything from its Bing search engine to Windows smartphones and its Xbox videogame system. The need to add a communications component is seen as crucial with the growing popularity of Apple Inc.'s Facetime video-chat service and Google Inc.'s Voice.

Microsoft has invested heavily in marketing and improving the technology of its Bing search engine. While it has made some market share gains over the past year, Google still dominates the search market with more than 65% of U.S. searches going through its site.

About 170 million people log in to Skype's services every month, though not all of them make calls. Skype users made 207 billion minutes of voice and video calls last year.
"Skype is a phenomenal service that is loved by millions of people around the world," Mr. Ballmer said in a statement announcing the deal Tuesday. "Together we will create the future of real-time communications so people can easily stay connected to family, friends, clients and colleagues anywhere in the world."
The Skype deal ranks as the biggest acquisition in the 36-year history of Microsoft, a company that traditionally has shied away from large deals. In 2007, Microsoft paid approximately $6 billion to acquire online advertising firm aQuantive Inc. Many current and former Microsoft executives believe Microsoft significantly overpaid for that deal. But they are also relieved that Microsoft gave up on an unsolicited $48 billion offer for Yahoo Inc. nearly three years ago. Yahoo is valued at half that sum today.
Mr. Ballmer, though, sees the Internet as an essential battleground for Microsoft, a company that still makes the vast bulk of its profits from Windows and Office software systems. Investors have become increasingly concerned about Microsoft's ability to squeeze continued growth out of those businesses, as rival technologies from Apple, Google and others put more pressure on profits.

The division behind Microsoft's hugely lucrative Office suite of applications also makes a product, known as Lync, which ties together email, instant messaging and voice communications into a single application. Skype could strengthen that offering.
The deal shows how far Skype has come since it was launched in 2003 by Niklas Zennstrom and Janus Friis, two men who had created a file-sharing technology called Kazaa that became widely associated with music piracy. While Skype was initially popular with techies, it increasingly worked its way into the mainstream by offering free or cheap phone calls which were especially appealing to international callers.

When eBay Inc. purchased the company in 2005 for $2.6 billion in cash and stock, Skype was regarded as something of an experiment in which eBay's buyers and sellers would use the service to communicate about potential transactions.

The experiment faltered, and eBay gave up on Skype in 2009,selling a 70% stake to a group of technology investors including Silver Lake Partners, venture capital firms Index Ventures and Andreessen Horowitz, and the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, who will make a handsome return on the Microsoft transaction.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and J.P.Morgan Chase & Co. advised Skype on the deal, according to people familiar with the matter. Microsoft isn't using any financial advisers for the deal, the people added.

The agreement was approved by the boards of Microsoft and Skype and is subject to regulatory approvals.
Microsoft shares fell 2.1% to $25.29 in early trading Tuesday, while eBay shares were up 2.8% to $34.06.
For all its promise, Skype has had a mixed history as an operating business. It has produced little net profit in the eight years since it was founded. Profits continue to remain elusive as the company expands its business world-wide. Last year the company posted revenue of $860 million and $264 million in operating profits, but still had a loss of $7 million. The company had $686 million in long-term debt as of Dec. 31.
Skype uses a technology called voice over Internet protocol, which treats calls as data like email messages and routes them over the Internet, rather than a traditional phone network. Skype's software, which can be downloaded free, allows users to call other Skype users on computers or certain cellphones for free. Skype users can also call land lines for a fee and conduct video calls.

Skype could play a role in Microsoft's effort to turn around its fortunes in the mobile-phone market, an area where it has lagged behind rivals Apple and Google. The company last year launched a new operating system for mobile phones known as Windows Phone 7 that has been well reviewed by technology critics but hasn't yet meaningfully improved Microsoft's market share.

Microsoft will likely need to tread carefully, though, in integrating Skype into its mobile software because of the potential for pushback from wireless carriers, whose support Microsoft badly needs. Skype could give consumers a way to make cheap phone calls over the Internet from mobile phones, without paying higher rates to the carriers.
Last August, Skype filed documents to go public but put its IPO plans on hold after bringing in Mr. Bates. Skype had expected to raise close to $1 billion through its IPO, people familiar with the matter said at the time. At the same time, the Luxembourg-based company entertained conversations in the past with potential buyers and joint-venture partners, including Facebook Inc., Google and Cisco Systems Inc., according to other people familiar with the matter. Skype had sought between $5 billion and $6 billion to sell itself, they added. The blog GigaOm earlier reported news of Microsoft's interest in Skype.

—Spencer E. Ante and Roger Cheng contributed to this article.

Monday, May 09, 2011

White iPhone sparked skirmish at Beijing Apple Store | Phones | Macworld

White iPhone sparked skirmish at Beijing Apple Store | Phones | Macworld

by Michael Kan, IDG News Service May 9, 2011 2:30 pm

The long wait for Apple products in Beijing turned ugly over the weekend when a skirmish erupted outside one of the companyʼs stores, resulting in a broken glass door and injuries to customers and one employee. Appleʼs iPad 2 had just gone on sale, but it was the white iPhone 4, released a week earlier, that caused the trouble.

News of Saturdayʼs incident has circulated in the local Chinese press, with photos on the Web showing an Apple customer bloodied and laying on the ground. A spokesman for Beijingʼs public security bureau said on Monday that the parties involved in the dispute had resolved the matter, but he gave no other details.

Customers wait to buy Appleʼs iPad 2 on Monday, two days after a skirmish erupted outside the Beijing store.

Apple said in a statement that its Beijing store located in the Sanlitun district closed for several hours on Saturday after a group outside of the store “became unruly.”

“The store team acted to protect themselves and our customers by closing the doors and preventing the group from entering. The safety of our customers and employees is our top priority,” Apple said.

In the last two weeks, long lines have formed outside the Beijing Apple store for the local launch of the companyʼs white iPhone 4, and then the iPad 2, which went on sale in the country on Friday. Demand for the products has been so great that sales of the devices have also attracted scalpers, who triggered Saturdayʼs skirmish, according to a source familiar with the incident.

According to that person, a man had tried three times to cut in line to buy the white iPhone 4, and had been escorted aside by Apple security. The man then shoved and grabbed one of the security workers, who pushed back in defense, the source said. The man then fell to the ground, refusing to get up, and his mother then got involved by also pushing the security workers, according to the source.

Apple employees then decided to lock and close the door to the store. A group of people responded by shaking and grabbing the door. The door then shattered, which injured an Apple employee, the source said.

Following the incident, business returned to normal at the store. On Monday, the glass door was already repaired. The long line had also gone, with only about a dozen people waiting to buy an iPad 2 from the store. Notices posted outside, however, warn that the company will contact authorities if scalpers are found selling to or harassing customers.

Apple said the demand in China for its latest product, the iPad 2, has been “amazing.” On Monday morning, Appleʼs Beijing Sanlitun store reported running out of the white version of the device, but still had the black version in stock.

Apple has four stores in China: two in Beijing and two in Shanghai. Apple also uses authorized resellers and its online store to sell its products across China. But on Monday, Appleʼs online store for China appeared to no longer offer orders of its iPad 2 or the white iPhone 4.



Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Obama Birth Certificate Released By White House (PHOTO)

Obama Birth Certificate Released By White House (PHOTO)

The indignity that bigoted birthers have put this president through, and by reference all African Americans, have made me think thoughts that I have not wanted to think for years. It has required a lot of prayers to hold at bay my desire for Second Amendment remedies. :)

John H. Armwood




Saturday, April 23, 2011

David Sparks Talks About His Book Mac At Work

The Best Book Available Om Mac Software

Senator Al Franken wants answers from Apple CEO Steve Jobs on reports that the devices can track users’ location. Google Android Phones Apparent track and receive transmissions of data from Android devices.



I am actually not very concerned about tracking accept when it is being used for marketing purposes. Google has a direct pecuniary interest in mining this data while Apple's interest is a good bit more murky plus there is no evidence that Apple is actually being transmitted this data where Google is being transmitted this data.

Dropbox addresses privacy concerns | Storage | MacUser | Macworld

Image representing Dropbox as depicted in Crun...Image via CrunchBaseDropbox addresses privacy concerns | Storage | MacUser | Macworld

Cloud-storage service clarifies who has access to your files
Posted on Apr 21, 2011 1:03 pm by Dan Moren, Macworld.com
In the wake of recent changes to the wording of its terms of service, cloud-storage service Dropbox has come under fire for claims it made about exactly who has access to your files. On Thursday, Dropbox took to its blog and attempted to clarify details about its security and privacy practices.
Concerns first arose after Dropbox recently reworded the section of its terms of service about compliance with law enforcement. According to Dropbox, that change was made to narrow the scope of that section, and to specify the situations in which the company might reveal information about its users. Itʼs worth noting, as the company does, that this clause isnʼt unique to Dropbox: Google, Skype, Twitter, and Apple all have terms of service that say they are required to comply with government investigations if requested.

Private lives However, as the new terms clearly say that Dropbox will give law enforcement access to usersʼfiles stored in Dropbox when legally required to do so, thereʼs a question of exactly who has access to those files.

Prior to Thursday, the features page on Dropboxʼs Website contained the pretty straightforward claims that “All files stored on Dropbox are encrypted (AES-256)” and “Dropbox employees are unable to view user files [emphasis added].”
ThatDropbox's features page prior to Thursday (left) and on Thursday (right).
sentiment is reinforced by a Dropbox help center document, which states that both “Nobody can see your private files in Dropbox unless you deliberately invite them or put them in your Public folder” and “Dropbox employees arenʼt able to access user files, and when troubleshooting an account they only have access to file metadata (filenames, file sizes, etc., not the file contents).”

Those claims suggest that technological factors prevent Dropbox employees from accessing user files. However, that would seem to conflict with Dropboxʼs statement that it will provide access to files for law enforcement—after all, what good are files that canʼt be viewed?
In a statement provided to Macworld, Dropbox Chief Technology Officer Arash Ferdowsi said the claim that Dropbox employees couldnʼt access files “is not an intentionally misleading statement —it is enforced by technical access controls on our backend storage infrastructure as well as strict policy prohibitions. The contents of a file will never be accessed by a Dropbox employee without the userʼs permission.”

However, Ferdowsi acknowledged that the claim could be misinterpreted, especially in the context of Dropboxʼs statement that it encrypts all files. As a result, Ferdowsi said the company would change the text to read “Dropbox employees are prohibited from accessing user files.”
As of Thursday, the features page has been updated to remove the statement about employees not being able to access files; the updated version of the text has yet to appear, though. The help center document remains unchanged for the moment, though Dropboxʼs blog post says that it
will be updated with more details as well. Keys to the kingdom Still, the fact that Dropbox can access files to provide to law enforcement means that the keys to those encrypted files are held not by the user, but by Dropbox itself. Ferdowsi confirmed that in a statement to Macworld:
The keys are known to Dropbox alone—Dropbox servers must be able to decrypt files in order to allow users to view their own files on our website. As with almost every other online service, there are a limited number of employees who must be able to access user data when legally required to do so, and to help troubleshoot usersʼ accounts with their consent.

Without possession of the decryption keys, the security of usersʼ files depends on just how much you trust Dropbox; itʼs a bit like your landlord having a key to your apartment. Dropbox claims, though, that itʼs only received about one government request per month over the last year—thatʼs 12 requests for more than 25 million users—and that its legal team vets all requests before taking any action.
So, is there reason for concern? It depends on your level of comfort. As always, convenience and security exist in a balance—the more you get of one, the less you get of the other. Certainly, nothing has materially changed between yesterday and today: Itʼs just as hard (or easy) to access Dropbox files now as it was then.
Overall, though, the concerns are less about the security of Dropbox than it is about the misleading claims—intentional or not—that the company made, versus the reality of the situation. In the case of a service on which many users store personal and private information, that lack of transparency may not exactly be reassuring.
Those who do store sensitive information on their Dropbox—and would rather that really only they can access it—should consider encrypting the files before putting them into Dropbox (for example, by using Mac OS Xʼs Disk Utility feature to create an encrypted disk image). That has its own drawbacks though, since it interferes with some of Dropboxʼs features, like easy access to versioning control—youʼll have multiple versions of the disk image, but not individual files— and you wonʼt be able to view those files via the serviceʼs mobile applications.

In the end, though, it all comes down to one of the cardinal rules of the Internet: If youʼve got something you donʼt want to see on the front page of The New York Times, then donʼt let it out of
your sight.

Updated at 11:23 a.m. PT to clarify the downsides of encrypted disk images.

The New York Times reports more than 100,000 digital subscribers | Web | iOS Central | Macworld

Image representing New York Times as depicted ...Image via CrunchBaseThe New York Times reports more than 100,000 digital subscribers | Web | iOS Central | Macworld

The Gray Lady may start to see a bit more green, thanks to its recently introduced digital subscription plans. On Thursday, The New York Times reported that it amassed more than 100,000 subscribers since March 28—the day the Times began instituting a limit on the number of articles visitors may read on its Website each month.

The Times’s paywall works like this: Readers can freely read 20 articles each month at the Website, and certain articles (like those linked from Twitter and Facebook) don’t count against your quota. To avoid that limit, you need to pay a minimum of $15 per month, which gets you unlimited access on the Website and via its smartphone apps (available for the iPhone, Blackberry, and Android devices). iPad app-based access to the Times costs $20 per month, and also includes full Website access—but not smartphone access. And if you simply want to consume Times content no matter what device you’re using, you need the $35 per month All Digital Access plan. (There will be no quiz later.)

If you’re playing along at home, you may be calculating 100,000 subscribers times a minimum of a $15 monthly subscription fee—but that would be a mistake. As the Times itself notes, “most subscribers have paid a discounted introductory rate of 99 cents for four weeks of access.” But the paper adds that Janet L. Robinson, chief executive of the Times Company, says that the number of full-price renewals is strong.

The paper reports that the 15 percent drop in its site’s overall traffic (in light of the article limits for non-paying readers) is consistent with its expectations.

There’s a lot riding on the Times’s digital subscription plans; the company reported that—thanks to ever-declining print advertising rates—net income fell 57.6 percent, to $5.4 million, compared to $12.8 million in the year-ago quarter. The company hasn't yet reported specifically on digital subscription revenue.

Friday, April 22, 2011

Report: Google, Too, Is Collecting Location Information From Phones : The Two-Way : NPR

Image representing Google as depicted in Crunc...Image via CrunchBaseReport: Google, Too, Is Collecting Location Information From Phones : The Two-Way : NPR

by EYDER PERALTA
Two days after researchers discovered that Apple's iPhone keeps an unencrypted log of everywhere you go, The Wall Street Journal reports that Google is also collecting location information from Android devices:
In the case of Google, according to new research by security analyst Samy Kamkar, an HTC Android phone collected its location every few seconds and transmitted the data to Google at least several times an hour. It also transmitted the name, location and signal strength of any nearby Wi-Fi networks, as well as a unique phone identifier.
Google declined to comment on the findings.

Until last year, Google was collecting similar Wi-Fi data with its fleet of StreetView cars that map and photograph streets world-wide. The company shut down its StreetView Wi-Fi collection last year after it inadvertently collected e-mail addresses, passwords and other personal information from Wi-Fi networks. The data that Mr. Kamkar observed being transmitted on Android phones didn't include such personal information.
Google's passive collection of data has come under scrutiny before. In response, it has said the data they collect is anonymous and at least for the data used for traffic information on Google Maps, Google says it deletes the start and end point of each trip.

Google even has a page explaining how to opt out of sending your GPS coordinates to the Google Maps' My Location. When you first setup an Android phone, it specifically asks if you'd like to send anonymous data to Google. A user has the ability to turn off location services.

Here's the rub: Turning off location services would in essence take away what makes mobile devices so appealing. It means you couldn't
find your nearest pizza joint on Yelp! or use Google Maps to find your way back home.
Google took issue with the Journal's use of the word "unique phone identifier." The number Google receives is random, they say, and it is only used in order for the servers to be able to adequately communicate with the phone.

"All location sharing on Android is opt-in by the user" read a statement released by Google. "We provide users with notice and control over the collection, sharing and use of location in order to provide a better mobile experience on Android devices. Any location data that is sent back to Google location servers is anonymized and is not tied or traceable to a specific user."

On the Apple front, yesterday, Congressman Ed Markey (D-Mass.) sent a letter to Apple's CEO Steve Jobs.
"I am concerned about this report and the consequences of this feature for individuals," Markey wrote.
Markey then asks several questions from Jobs. Among them: Did Apple notify its users that iPhones were recording location and Wi-Fi information and then copying a backup file with that info onto the computer with which the device is synchronized? What is Apple using this information for and is it for commercial reasons? What is Apple doing to protect the underage users who own their devices?

Monday, April 18, 2011

Dropbox hits 25 million users, talks branded gear | Electronista

Image representing Dropbox as depicted in Crun...Image via CrunchBase

Dropbox has just announced that it reached a milestone 25 million users for its cloud-based storage service that lets users stream their own music from the web. The service is available in 175 countries and Monday also marks its newfound availability in Spanish, German, French and Japanese in addition to English. The company grew significantly since just four million subscribers one year and three months ago.

The company's founders also plan to bring out Dropbox-branded hardware over the course of the next 12 months. While nothing is set, the gadgets that could make the most of the Dropbox service include printers, scanners, cameras and TVs.

Dropbox offers a free service that includes storage of up to 2GB, while $20 per month allows 100GB of file storage. Ease of use is a big reason for the growing popularity, Dropbox believed, as it mainly involves dragging and dropping files.

Dropbox is available for WindowsLinux and OS X platforms as well as BlackBerryAndroid and iOS phones and portable devices. [via SeattlePI]

Access Dropbox here

Friday, March 25, 2011

Google Patches 6 Serious Chrome Bugs - PCWorld

Google Chrome IconImage via WikipediaGoogle Patches 6 Serious Chrome Bugs - PCWorld

Google on Thursday patched six vulnerabilities in Chrome, and as usual, silently updated users' copies of the browser.

The update to Chrome 10.0.648.204 also included two more blacklisted SSL certificates that may be related to last week's theft of nine digital certificates from a Comodo reseller.

All six bugs were rated "high," Google's second-most-serious ranking in its threat scoring system. Of the half-dozen bugs, two were "use after free" flaws -- a type of memory management bug that can be exploited to inject attack code -- while a second pair were pegged by Google as "stale pointer" vulnerabilities, another kind of memory allocation flaw.

As is Google's practice, the company locked down its bug-tracking database, blocking access to the technical details of the patched vulnerabilities. Google usually unlocks the bug entries several weeks, sometimes months later, to give users time to update before the information goes public.

Google paid out $8,500 in bounties to three different researchers for finding and reporting the six vulnerabilities. So far this year, Google has cut bounty checks totaling $58,145.

Frequent-contributor Sergey Glazunov took home $7,000 for reporting four of the bugs patched Thursday, bringing his 2011 bounty total to $20,634. Glazunov has become the most prolific of the independent researchers who specialize in rooting out Chrome flaws, reporting 14 of the 54 bugs attributed to outsiders.

Yesterday was the sixth time Google patched security vulnerabilities in its browser this year.

Google said the update also added support for the browser's password manager on Linux, and included performance and stability fixes. According to the Chrome change list, it also blacklisted two additional SSL (secure socket layer) certificates , the digital certificates that encrypt traffic between users and sites.

The additions to the SSL blacklist may be connected to last week's theft of several certificates from a Comodo reseller, an event that prompted Comodo to revoke the stolen certificates. Since then, Google, Mozilla and Microsoft have each issued updates -- Google was the first off the mark -- to block the certificates and warn users if they tried to connect to fake sites.

Comodo has cited circumstantial evidence that points to Iran , perhaps the Iranian government, being involved in the certificate theft.

Google did not immediately reply to questions Friday about whether the newest additions to Chrome's blacklist were related to the Comodo theft.

Chrome 10 can be downloaded for Windows, Mac OS X and Linux from Google's Web site. Users already running the browser will be updated automatically.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

First Look: Firefox 4 Web browser Review | Browsers & Add-Ons | Macworld



First Look: Firefox 4 Web browser Review | Browsers & Add-Ons | Macworld

For years, Firefox has trundled along at the back of the browser pack, a beast of burden laden with fancy features but lacking speed. Not anymore. Mozilla has released Firefox 4, and in our preliminary tests, the browser makes a huge performance leap forward.

On a 2GHz Core 2 Duo aluminum MacBook with 2GB of RAM, Firefox 4 roughly quadrupled Firefox 3.6.15’s speed in an XHTML rendering test and the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark. Its Acid3 score improved by 3 points (reaching 97 out of 100), and it gained more than 100 points out of 400 on its predecessor in an HTML5 compliance test (255 and 9 bonus points vs. 155 and 4 bonus points).

Against other browsers, Firefox 4’s XHTML and CSS rendering speed still trails the latest versions of Safari, Opera, and Chrome, and it lacks their perfect Acid3 scores. But its HTML5 compliance outscores Safari’s and Opera’s, and only slightly lags Chrome’s, and in the SunSpider test, Firefox 4’s JägerMonkey JavaScript engine beats everyone else.

Firefox 4 packs a few other happy improvements under the hood. It now offers full support for CSS3 transforms and transitions, and hugely enhanced support for CSS3 animations. Built-in hardware acceleration vastly speeds up page rendering; however, in a Mozilla-created “stress test,” my computer and browser only eked out 2 frames per second when attempting 3D transformations on multiple 2D images. Firefox 4’s superb support for WebGL 3D graphics, Google’s new WebM open source video codec, and OpenType font rendering left me much more impressed.

Firefox 4’s interface changes are a somewhat mixed bag. Tabs now top the URL bar, Chrome-style, and you can now jump directly to a tab by starting to type its name in the “awesome bar” –nice, but nothing major. I liked the “app tab” feature, which lets you shift Gmail, Google Docs, and other much-used Web apps into tiny, space-saving icon tabs at the far left of the tab list.

The ability to group tabs by dragging and dropping left me cold, though. You must switch to an entirely separate screen, and drag tabs one by one into groups. The whole process just added an extra layer of clutter and confusion to my browsing.

We’re working on a full review of Firefox 4. For now, Firefox 4 looks like a happy compromise between speed-demon performance and a polished interface.

[Nathan Alderman is a writer and editor in Alexandria, Va.]

Monday, March 21, 2011

Apple releases Mac OS X 10.6.7 | Operating Systems | MacUser | Macworld

Image representing Apple as depicted in CrunchBaseImage via CrunchBaseApple releases Mac OS X 10.6.7 | Operating Systems | MacUser | Macworld

If you thought your old friend Snow Leopard was getting a little long in the tooth, fear not: Apple has released Mac OS X 10.6.7, the latest update to the venerable feline.

In addition to providing the standard enhancements for stability, compatibility, and security, 10.6.7 improves the reliability of Back to My Mac, resolves an issue with transferring files to SMB servers, and makes minor updates to the Mac App Store. In addition, the update incorporates a number of security fixes to Snow Leopard, which are also available separately as Security Update 2011-001.

Other fixes packed into the update include additional RAW image compatibility for digital cameras, an issue with MacBook Air (Mid 2010) kernel panics, and AirPort driver issues. In addition, brightness on external displays and projectors is improved, as is a DVD Player playback issue on 64-bit Macs.

Also fixed is a rare issue in Mac OS X 10.6.5 that could cause user accounts to disappear from the Login window and System Preferences after putting the system to sleep.

Mac OS X 10.6.7 is available in both server and client editions via Software Update and directly from Apple’s Website. For the full list of fixes, read on.

Improve the reliability of Back to My Mac.
Resolve an issue when transferring files to certain SMB servers.
Address various minor Mac App Store issues.
Additional improvements

Includes all the improvements in the previous Mac OS X v10.6.1, 10.6.2, 10.6.3, 10.6.4, 10.6.5, and 10.6.6 updates.
Includes Safari 5.0.4.

Includes RAW image compatibility for additional digital cameras.
For information about the security content of this update, please visit article HT1222.
Resolves a window resizing issue with X-Plane 9 on Macs with ATI graphics
Addresses an issue with MacBook Air (Mid 2010) computers that could cause a kernel panic.
Address issues in the AirPort driver for certain devices.
Improves brightness on external displays and projectors.
Addresses an issue where DVD Player may display black video on some Macs using the 64-bit kernel.
Addresses an issue with some NEC displays in which the screen may appear black when connected to a Mac Pro (Mid 2010).
Resolves an issue in which some Multiple Master (MM) fonts were missing from Mac Pro (Mid 2010), MacBook Pro (15-inch & 17-inch Mid 2010), and iMac (Mid 2010) computers.

Addresses various issues with MacBook Air (Mid 2010) computer performance.
Resolves an issue in which clicking the Updates tab in the Mac App Store could cause the Mac App Store to become unresponsive.
Fixes a problem opening an afp:// URL that points to a file, and changes the AFP mount path to conform to previous Mac OS X releases. For details, see article HT4538.
Includes the ability to repair certain issues that may prevent hardware RAID volumes from mounting. For more information, see article TS3631.
Fixes a rare issue in Mac OS X v10.6.5 that could cause user accounts to disappear from the Login window and System Preferences after putting the system to sleep.
Improves the reliability of dragging files or folders to the Trash when using an NFS home directory.

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Brighthand.com - AT&T Acquiring T-Mobile, To Become the Largest U.S. Carrier

Brighthand.com - AT&T Acquiring T-Mobile, To Become the Largest U.S. Carrier

AT&T Acquiring T-Mobile, To Become the Largest U.S. Carrier
by Ed Hardy - 3/20/2011
AT&T has just announced that it is buying struggling T-Mobile USA from Deutsche Telekom AG in a deal that will make it the largest cell phone company in the United States in the number of subscribers.

AT&T is paying approximately $39 billion in cash and stock for T-Mobile USA, who is currently the fourth largest wireless carrier in America. DT will end up owning around 8% of AT&T.

The deal has been approved by the Boards of Directors of both companies, but government regulators will have to sign off on it, too, and there's likely to be considerable scrutiny -- if approved, one of the big four carriers is going away and one of the remaining ones is becoming much larger.

T-Mobile currently has 34 million subscribers, but once these are combined with AT&T's the company will have 129 million. That will make it bigger than Verizon Wireless.

It's All about the Network

Both AT&T and T-Mobile use the GSM standard, and are working on 4G LTE networks, so combining them is a relatively simple process.

Randall Stephenson, AT&T Chairman and CEO, said, "This transaction delivers significant customer, shareowner and public benefits that are available at this level only from the combination of these two companies with complementary network technologies, spectrum positions and operations. We are confident in our ability to execute a seamless integration, and with additional spectrum and network capabilities, we can better meet our customers' current demands, build for the future and help achieve the President's goals for a high-speed, wirelessly connected America."

With the additional cell towers and wireless spectrum it is acquiring with T-Mobile, AT&T is committing to a significant expansion of its future 4G LTE service. It now believes it will eventually be able to reach 95 percent of the U.S. population.

It was no secret that Deutsche Telekom has been looking for a buyer for some time. There had been reports that T-Mobile and Sprint might merge, bringing together the third and fourth largest U.S. carriers -- however, these two use incompatible wireless networks, so a merger wouldn't be any easy one.